Our brochures and web sites may not be big, but here is a sampling of the past results, present cases, and cases under investigation:*
Perry v. Popovich, Maricopa County Arizona: $5.1 million verdict on RICO/fraud case.
Freeman v. Opus West, Maricopa County Arizona: $3.9 million final settlement after trial and appeal on premises liability case where workers fell from side of high rise.
Young v. Stanton, Maricopa County, Arizona, $70,000.00 judgment on fraudulent debt management case.
Kramer v. King, Bakersfield, California, $125,000.00 stipulation for Mexican Land Fraud case.
Berry v. Galen (hospital), Maricopa Couny, Arizona, confidential result, EMTALA and medical negligence case (failure to diagnose signs of cauda equina resulting in paraplegia).
Pellman v. Alcorn, Maricopa County, Arizona, confidential result, lawyer negligence, legal malpractice case concerning catastrophic personal injury.
Thornton v. Living Centers - Rocky Mountains, Inc., Dover, Delaware and Maricopa County, Arizona, confidential result, nursing home abuse case of a quadplegic.
Doe v. New York University, Southern District, New York, confidential result, Title IX sexual harassment case.
Ramer v. Ancestory.com, Inc., Arizona District Court and Utah District Court, class action for TILA (Truth in Lending Act) violation, class settlement court approved.
Rucker adv. Miller, Maricopa County, Arizona, free speech case, successful quashing of injunction issued against a citizen watchdog for observing and complaining about police officer's conduct.
Goodman v. Arpaio, Maricopa County, civil rights case against "the Toughest Sheriff in America," confidential result.
Silva v. Penske Trucking, Palm Springs, California, Rental truck rollover with catastrophic injury.
McCollum v. Peterson Johnson, Maricopa County, Arizona, legal malpractice case, confidential result.
Shackleford v. Class A Roofing, Maricopa County, Arizona, $37,000 judgment
Chavez v. Safeway Stores, Maricopa County, Arizona, Title VII, sexual harassment case, case resolved on confidential terms.
*PAST RESULTS ARE NOT AN INDICATION OF ANY FUTURE RESULT. THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES IN ANY CASE OR IN ANY LITIGATION. MOREOVER, IN CASES RESOLVED WITHOUT JUDGMENT, THE CLIENT STIPULATED THAT THE RESOLUTION WAS NEVER AN ADMISSION BY DEFENDANTS OF THE ALLEGATIONS CITED ABOVE.
